☆倭姫の宝珠☆The Wish-Fulfilling Secret Jewel of the Japan Princess Yamato-hime: 09/26/16

☆倭姫の宝珠の願い☆

☆☆☆倭姫の願い☆☆☆

☆大宇宙の真理-合理性を知らしめる倭姫☆

Princess Japan Yamatohime showing the truth and the rationality of the Philosophy in the Mankind World

☆ 宝珠 ☆

如意宝珠-Cintamani
（にょいほうじゅ　チンターマニ　梵: चिन्तामणि [cintaamaNi]）とは、仏教において様々な霊験を表すとされる宝の珠のこと。サンスクリット語でチンターとは「思考」、マニは「珠」を指す言葉で、「意のままに様々な願いをかなえる宝」という意味である。如意宝、如意珠、または単に宝珠（ほうじゅ、ほうしゅ）とも呼ばれる。

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A6%82%E6%84%8F%E5%AE%9D%E7%8F%A0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cintamani

☆ NOTE:下記掲載の如意宝珠観音の人形の作品の画像の出典元 ☆：
http://www.pict-jp.net/odakobo/index.html
http://www.pict-jp.net/odakobo/kannon.html

2016年9月26日月曜日

地震周期説のカラクリを教えます ( 武田邦彦ブログ音声より )

地震周期説のカラクリを教えます ( 武田邦彦ブログ音声より )　

2015/03/05 に公開

武田邦彦 ( 中部大学教授 )
ブログ音声 [ http://takedanet.com ] より

・あきらめよう！　地震予知はできない　その３
2015/03/06 ブログ記事 [ http://takedanet.com/archives/1021192... ]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【武田邦彦】熊本地震予測が外れる理由を、科学者的目線で明言。

2016/04/19 に公開
2016年4月18日
熊本地震を、科学的目線でニュース解説。

テレビ、新聞、雑誌に出てくる、
地震学者、地震専門家、と自称している面々は
、
どうして、地震予測、地震予知、が当たらないのか？

その理由を、
武田邦彦が、科学的根拠を示しながら、解説しています。

みなさん、どう感じますか？

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

なぜ、熊本に地震が起きたのか？

2016/04/14 に公開

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【武田邦彦】地震予知・火山予報は当たらないのに、悪びれない学者たち！

2016/09/06 に公開

【武田邦彦】地震予知・火山予報は当たらないのに、悪びれない学者たち！

ご覧頂きありがとうございます！

◆武田邦彦：https://youtu.be/7AHc83NgZC4 より
画像引用元：http://alpacask.com/img/11842/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

デタラメ地震予知にご用心 ( 武田邦彦ブログ音声より )　#武田邦彦 #武田教授

2015/03/22 に公開

武田邦彦 ( 中部大学教授 )
ブログ音声 [ http://takedanet.com ] より
　
・あきらめよう！　地震は予知できない
2015/03/01 ブログ記事 [ http://takedanet.com/archives/1020798... ]
　
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【ロバート・ゲラー博士】武田邦彦なぜ、熊本に地震が起こったのか？

2016/04/18 に公開
2016年4月18日

ノーカットUPです。
地上波では決して聞くことが出来ない、地震学会の裏側を隠さず話してます。
真実を聞いて、私たちは、何を考えて、何をすべきか？
あなた自身で考えるきっかけになるとうれしいです。

ゲスト：地震学者のロバート・ゲラー博士

司会聞き手：武田邦彦

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ISE'no-Kamikaze

【Let's Create Future with Hope】
Let's make Peaceful and Hopeful World for Sustainable Future.
Let's make “Offshore Structure such as Noah's Ark”.
Anti-nuclear power

世界の人口増大にともなって、生まれてくる食料問題が世界的な大きな課題となってきた。中国やインド、アジア・アフリカ諸国等の人口増大に伴って、食料資源や産業用の鉱物資源の争奪・獲得競争の激化による国際紛争の多発が予想ではなくなり、現実に、我々の生活に、影響を与え始めてきている。

私達は、我々の子々孫々のために、希望のある平和の世界を築いていかなければならない。　

世界の人口増大に対応し、新しい産業や産業労働市場や雇用分野の開発・増大、自然再生循環系（sustainable)の経済・社会体制を築いていかなければならないでしょう。
　
私達は、地球の表面積の約７０％を占める海域を有効に利用して、大型浮体式海洋構造物を大規模で活用することによって、海上での農業・畜産業を発展させることができる時代を迎えている。

私達は、海洋を有効利用して、海洋牧場を展開したり、海洋資源（海洋生物、海底の鉱物）等を獲得する方法を発展させて、社会的な利益を得ることができるような時代に位地している。

現代は、世界の平和の秩序の中で安寧のある世界を実現して構築することができるような時代になってきている。

例えば洋上風力発電・洋上太陽光発電等の新産業の育成や新しい雇用創出・増大を目的として、新しい海洋開発事業・産業を創生し、確固たる平和創生の理念に基づく新しい事業・プロジェクトを推進・発展させ、世界中の青年の夢と希望を拡げながら国際的な協力を進め、安寧と希望ある未来の社会を創って行きましょう。

【プロフィールの画像は横山大観作：屈原】

村井俊治東京大学名誉教授【地震予測が大幅向上！】地震予測と大企業の協力

2016/03/29 に公開

東京大学名誉教授村井俊治氏の予測はよく当たると言われてます。

彼は科学的な根拠で予測しています

～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～

南海地区で大地震警戒：村井教授の「累積ひずみ」による最先端地震予測

2014/05/22 に公開
［村井俊治教授］南海地区で大地震警戒：高精度の「累積ひずみ」による最先端地震予測
http://shanti-phula.net/ja/social/blo...

動画の概要
Mr.サンデーで再び村井俊治教授が取り上げられる！更に精度が高まった村井氏の地震予測！東京震度5や伊予灘地震を的中！　
http://saigaijyouhou.com/blog-categor...

5月18日(日曜)に放送された「Mrサンデー」というテレビ番組に、地震予測専門家の村井俊治(むらいしゅんじ)教授が再び取り上げられました。村井氏は全国に設置されているGPS観測網を利用して地震予測をしており、東日本大震災を含めた大地震の前兆をしっかりとこれらのデータで把握していたのです！

GPS観測網というのは全国各地の地殻変動を観測するためのシステムで、村井氏は大地震が発生する数週間から数ヶ月ほど前に数センチ単位の地殻変動が発生することを発見しました。

例えば、2003年に発生した北海道十勝沖地震の時は、事前に約4センチの変動を観測しています。また、新潟県中越沖地震や宮城沖地震でも例外なく、同じ様な変動を捉えていました。
しかしながら、当初の村井氏はこのようなデータには半信半疑で、2010年後半にかつて無いほどの猛烈な変動を観測するも、「データのエラー」として判断してしまいます。

その結果、東日本大震災の前兆を把握していたのに、東日本大震災に対する警告を発することが出来ませんでした。これは彼にかなりの精神的なショックを与えたみたいで、その時の後悔からデータを世間に発表することにしたと村井氏は話しています。

今は地震予測に本腰を入れているみたいで、新しい「累積ひずみ」という方式を導入して、更に地震予測の制度が前よりも上昇しているとのことです。私も彼のメルマガを登録していますが、中々興味深い情報やデータを提供してくれるので、中々読み応えがあります。現時点では詳細な日時を断言できるようなレベルではないですが、的中率が非常に高く、かなり参考になると言えるでしょう。最先端の地震予測に興味の有る方は、是非とも村井氏のメールマガジンを登録してみてください！

動画の出典：http://video.fc2.com/content/20140519vtZfwZu6/&otag=1&tk=

～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～

参考リンク

http://inoue-instagram-blog.com/%E5%9C%B0%E9%9C%87%E4%BA%88%E7%9F%A5-2016-%E6%9D%91%E4%BA%95-%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0-3%E6%9C%88-557/

村井教授2016年【最新の地震予知】NTTドコモとのコラボで予測の精度が上がる！？

村井教授とは？NTTドコモとのコラボ内容も紹介！
村井教授というのが、
どのような方なのかご存じない方もいらっしゃると思いますので、
村井名誉教授のご紹介とNTTDOCOMOと電子基準点を共同で建てる内容をシェアします。

村井教授というのは、
今でこそ日本の地震予知業界では有名な方ですが、
東京都出身で東京大学(東大)で測量学の名誉教授として君臨する
測量学会では世界的な権威な方なんです。

お名前は村井俊治(むらいしゅんじ)さん。
1939年(昭和14年)生まれで、2016年には77才になられます。

地震予知や地震予言にアンテナを張っている人は
だいぶ前からご存じだったかもしれませんが、
世間一般に知られるようになったのはMr.サンデーというテレビ番組の出演です。

村井教授は、
2015年9月6日にミスターサンデーに出演し、
9月・10月に大きな地震が起こる事を示唆し、警告を出していました。

すると、
なんと番組出演のたった6日後、、、

東京都調布市で震度5の地震が発生し
一躍注目の人となったわけです！

地震予知業界では、
村井教授と並んで早川教授という有名な方がいますが、
早川教授については別の記事でシェアしますね！

そんな中、
2016年の3月6日に再びMr.サンデーに出演し、
首都直下型地震についての特集が組まれたわけですが
そこで村井教授がNTTドコモとのコラボで電子基準点を設置することが発表されました。

そもそも、
村井教授の地震前兆予測方法というのが、
日本全国に電子基準点を置き、その基準点における地殻変動データより
大地震の発生を予測するという手法なのです。

で、
今までの問題点は、
村井教授が顧問を務めるJESEAという機構が
独自に電子基準点を設置して前兆現象の把握に努めていたわけですが
結論から言うとお金が足りずに、電子基準点の設置台数が少なかったわけです。

ここに、
一役かってくれそうなのが
ドコモ！ということで期待は大なのです！！！

NTTDocomoとしてのメリットは、
ドコモユーザーへの緊急避難情報をいち早く発信出来るようになることで
ユーザーをソフトバンクやAUから呼び戻そうということなのでしょう。

2016年3月、、、首都直下型地震が起こる可能性はあるの？

首都直下型地震や関東大震災などの巨大地震に関しては、
2020年の東京オリンピックまでに100％発生する断言する教授もいるくらいなので、
近い将来大きな地震が起こる可能性は高いと考えて間違いないでしょう。
ですが、
そのタイミングが誰にもわからないので
地震予測をしてくださる学者の方がいて、
僕たちはその情報を有料で購入するわけです。
ということで、
2016年の3月に巨大地震が起こるかどうか？は、
確実ではありませんが、可能性としては全く否定できないということなのでしょう。

最後に、
今回紹介している村井教授が、
2016年3月に要警戒地域としている地方を紹介します。
以前より要警戒と言われている地域が、、、

房総半島
三浦半島
伊豆半島
御前崎付近

そして、
2016年3月最新の地震予言/警戒都道府県は、、、

富山県
石川県
福井県
長野県
新潟県
岐阜県

これら6県が、最警戒地域で

東京都
神奈川県
千葉県
山梨県

を中心とする関東地方と
南海トラフ地震や東海大地震が心配される

愛知県(名古屋)
静岡県

この2県も要警戒地域とされています。

村井教授の地震予言情報というのは、
目に見えないパワー的なものではなく
理論的な根拠を元にしたデータ解析でもあるので、
1年後の予測をたてることなどが難しいので定期的に最新情報を追いかける必要がありますね。
ということで、
2016年4月以降も最新情報が入り次第、
このブログでもシェアしていきたいと思います！

～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～

参考リンク

「来年3月までに南海トラフ巨大地震が起きる」的中率75%！？東大名誉教授の地震予測とは

2016/04/27 に公開

「南海トラフ巨大地震が迫っている」…と、世間では騒がれつつも、国の有識者会議が5月に出した結論は、「地震予知は現状では困難」というものだった。
その一方で、なんとか地震予知を実用化しようと様々なアプローチを試みている科学者もいる。
今回紹介する、東京大学名誉教授で測量学の世界的権威である村井俊治（しゅんじ）氏もその1人だ。
村井氏は、独自の方法論によって地震予測を繰り返した結果、的中率が75%にまで上昇。東日本大震災の前にも、同様の方法で前兆を捉えていたというのだから今回の予測も見逃せない。

ISE'no-Kamikaze

登録: 投稿 (Atom)

人気の投稿

民主党公約不履行ついて

伊勢の神風今回の選挙は、東日本大震災や福島原子力事故後の民主党政治政権への信任に対する可否を判別する大事な選挙である。このことと同時に、それまでの与党であった自民党、公明党に対する信任に対する可否を判別する選挙である。民主党の菅政権や野田政権は、民主党内部での統...

お吟さま

お吟さま（1962年）- 田中絹代 / Love under the Crucifix - Kinuyo Tanaka 2015/11/08 に公開製作：にんじんくらぶ / 配給：松竹映画株式会社公開：昭和37年（1962年） 6月 3日監督：田中絹代 / 脚色：成...

孫正義プレゼン二乗の兵法【成功哲学】

孫正義プレゼン二乗の兵法【成功哲学】追記：下記の２０１６年１２月１７日投稿のYoutubeの動画（孫正義プレゼン二乗の兵法【成功哲学】）No.1 は投稿後にアカントが停止されてしまっているので、他の参考リンク（0_２_孫の二乗の兵法 - 心構え）を選び、...

倭姫の宝珠の願い

倭姫の宝珠の願い倭姫の宝珠の願い倭姫の宝珠の願い Wish of The Precious Stone of The Yamatohime Princess Japan．賀正倭姫の宝珠の願い Wish of...

NUCLEAR POWER IS NOT THE ANSWER　by Helen Caldicott

http://www.dipity.com/javaiscoolmike/Nuclear-Power/ ================================================================ NUCLEAR POWER IS ...

日本未来の党のGoogle 検索数が刻々と増えている約 52,100,000 件

　伊勢の神風日本未来の党のGoogle 検索数が刻々と増えている２０１２年１２月０５日AM０：３５約 52,100,000 件 AM1：35 http://www.google.co.jp/webhp?sourceid=navclient&h...

鳳兮，鳳兮！

楚狂接輿歌『論語・微子』鳳兮，鳳兮！何德之衰。往者不可諫，來者猶可追。已而！已而！今之從政者殆而。楚狂　接輿歌鳳や，　　鳳や，何ぞ　　德の衰へたる。...

Google検索　：　未来の党を支持する約 64,200,000 件

Matuoka・Isenokamikaze 伊勢の神風今回の衆議院選挙において、日本未来の党の立候補者数が２５０名程度の準備があれば、日本未来の党単独で、政権を担うことができたであろう。国民の生活が第一の党の選挙準備が、整わないうちの解散選...

DNA Damage

DNA Damage DNALearningCenter さんが 2010/03/22 にアップロード Mutations are changes in genetic information. Originally created for DNA Interact...

（タイトルなし）

Renewable energy will overtake nuclear power by 2018, research says Renewables will provide enough power for one in 10 British homes by...

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

原発爆発と定点カメラNuclear Reactor Huge Explosions and Fixed point Camera
https://youtu.be/wE2eTebInJ8

公開日: 2012/03/24 a Camera that records huge hydrogen explosions of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. and relatively long reel of each explosion.

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster
The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (福島第一原子力発電所事故 Fukushima Dai-ichi (About this sound pronunciation) genshiryoku hatsudensho jiko?) was a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, following the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011.[5][6] It is the largest nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl disaster of 1986 and only the second disaster (along with Chernobyl) to measure Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale.[7]

The plant comprises six separate boiling water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE) and maintained by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). At the time of the quake, Reactor 4 had been de-fueled while 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance.[8] Immediately after the earthquake, the remaining reactors 1–3 shut down automatically and emergency generators came online to power electronics and coolant systems. However, the tsunami following the earthquake quickly flooded the low-lying rooms in which the emergency generators were housed. The flooded generators failed, cutting power to the critical pumps that must continuously circulate coolant water through a nuclear reactor for several days in order to keep it from melting down after being shut down. As the pumps stopped, the reactors overheated due to the normal high radioactive decay heat produced in the first few days after nuclear reactor shutdown (smaller amounts of this heat normally continue to be released for years, but are not enough to cause fuel melting).

As the water boiled away in the reactors and the water levels in the fuel rod pools dropped, the reactor fuel rods began to overheat severely and melt down. In the hours and days that followed, Reactors 1, 2 and 3 experienced full meltdown.[9][10]

In the high heat and pressure of the reactors, a reaction between the nuclear fuel metal cladding, and the water surrounding them, produced explosive hydrogen gas. As workers struggled to cool and shut down the reactors, several hydrogen-air chemical explosions occurred.[11][12] It is estimated that the hot cladding-water reaction in each reactor produced 800 to 1000 kilograms of hydrogen gas, which was vented out of the reactor pressure vessel, and mixed with the ambient air, eventually reaching explosive concentration limits in units 1 and 3, and due to piping connections between unit 3 and 4, unit 4 also filled with hydrogen, with the hydrogen-air explosions occurring at the top of each unit, that is in their upper secondary containment building.[13][14]

A few of the plant's workers were severely injured or killed by the disaster conditions (drowning, falling equipment damage etc.) resulting from the earthquake.[15][better source needed] Predicted future cancer deaths due to accumulated radiation exposures in the population living near Fukushima are predicted to be quite low. However, the researchers emphasized that the uncertainties in the calculations is high, suggesting further research is required.[16] On 16 December 2011, Japanese authorities declared the plant to be stable, although it would take decades to decontaminate the surrounding areas and to decommission the plant altogether.[17] On 5 July 2012, the Japanese National Diet appointed The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC) submitted its inquiry report to the Japanese Diet,[18] while the government appointed Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company submitted its final report to the Japanese government on 23 July 2012.[19] Tepco admitted for the first time on October 12, 2012 that it had failed to take stronger measures to prevent disasters for fear of inviting lawsuits or protests against its nuclear plants.[20][21][22][23]

The Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant consists of six light water, boiling water reactors (BWR) designed by General Electric driving electrical generators with a combined power of 4.7 gigawatts, making Fukushima I one of the 25 largest nuclear power stations in the world. Fukushima I was the first GE designed nuclear plant to be constructed and run entirely by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).

Unit 1 is a 439 MWe type (BWR-3) reactor constructed in July 1967. It commenced commercial electrical production on 26 March 1971.[24] It was designed for a peak ground acceleration of 0.18 g (1.74 m/s2) and a response spectrum based on the 1952 Kern County earthquake.[25] Units 2 and 3 are both 784 MWe type BWR-4 reactors, Unit 2 commenced operating in July 1974 and Unit 3 in March 1976. The earthquake design basis for all units ranged from 0.42 g (4.12 m/s2) to 0.46 g (4.52 m/s2).[26][27] All units were inspected after the 1978 Miyagi earthquake when the ground acceleration was 0.125 g (1.22 m/s2) for 30 seconds, but no damage to the critical parts of the reactor was discovered.[25]

Units 1–5 have a Mark 1 type (light bulb torus) containment structure, Unit 6 has Mark 2 type (over/under) containment structure.[25] From September 2010, Unit 3 has been partially fuelled by mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel.[28]

At the time of the accident, the units and central storage facility contained the following numbers of fuel assemblies:[29]

Power reactors work by splitting atoms, typically uranium, in a chain reaction. The reactor continues to generate heat after the chain reaction is stopped because of the radioactive decay of unstable isotopes, fission products, created by this process. This decay of unstable isotopes, and the decay heat that results, cannot be stopped.[32][33] Immediately after shutdown, this decay heat amounts to approximately 6% of full thermal heat production of the reactor.[32] The decay heat in the reactor core decreases over several days before reaching cold shutdown levels.[34] Nuclear fuel rods that have reached cold shutdown temperatures typically require another several years of water cooling in a spent fuel pool before decay heat production reduces to the point that they can be safely transferred to dry storage casks.[35]

To safely remove this decay heat, reactor operators must continue to circulate cooling water over fuel rods in the reactor core and spent fuel pond.[32][36] In the reactor core, circulation is accomplished by use of high pressure systems that pump water through the reactor pressure vessel and into heat exchangers. These systems transfer heat to a secondary heat exchanger via the essential service water system, taking away the heat which is pumped out to the sea or site cooling towers.[37]

To circulate cooling water when the reactor is shut down and not producing electricity, cooling pumps can be powered by other units on-site, by other units off-site through the grid, or by diesel generators.[36][38] In addition, boiling water reactors have steam-turbine driven emergency core cooling systems that can be directly operated by steam still being produced after a reactor shutdown, which can inject water directly into the reactor.[39] Steam turbines results in less dependence on emergency generators, but steam turbines only operate so long as the reactor is producing steam. Some electrical power, provided by batteries, is needed to operate the valves and monitoring systems.

If the water in the Unit 4 spent fuel pool had been heated to boiling temperature, the decay heat has the capacity to boil off about 70 tonnes of water per day (12 gallons per minute), which puts the requirement for cooling water in context.[40] On 16 April 2011, TEPCO declared that Reactors 1–4's cooling systems were beyond repair and would have to be replaced.[41]

The reason that cooling is so essential for a nuclear reactor, is that many of the internal components and fuel assembly cladding is made from zircaloy. At normal operating temperatures (of approximately 300 degrees Celsius), zircaloy is inert. However, when heated to above 500 degrees celsius in the presence of steam,[42] zircaloy undergoes an exothermic reaction where the zircaloy oxidises, and produces free hydrogen gas. The reaction between the zirconium cladding and the fuel can also lower the melting point of the fuel and thus speed up a core melt.[43]

The reactor's emergency diesel generators and DC batteries, crucial components in powering the reactors' cooling systems in the event of a power loss, were located in the basements of the reactor turbine buildings. The reactor design plans provided by General Electric specified placing the generators and batteries in that location, but mid-level engineers working on the construction of the plant were concerned that this made the back-up power systems vulnerable to flooding. TEPCO elected to strictly follow General Electric's design in the construction of the reactors.[44]
Contamination
Main article: Radiation effects from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster

Sub article: Comparison of Fukushima and Chernobyl nuclear accident with detailed tables inside

Map of contaminated areas around the plant (22 March – 3 April).

Fukushima dose rate comparison to other incidents and standards, with graph of recorded radiation levels and specific accident events from 11 to 30 March.

Radiation measurements from Fukushima Prefecture, March 2011

Seawater-contamination along coast with Caesium-137, from 21 March until 5 May (Source: GRS) Radioactive material has been released from the Fukushima containment vessels as the result of deliberate venting to reduce gaseous pressure, deliberate discharge of coolant water into the sea, and accidental or uncontrolled events. Concerns about the possibility of a large scale release of radioactivity resulted in 20 km exclusion zone being set up around the power plant and people within the 20–30 km zone being advised to stay indoors. Later, the UK, France and some other countries told their nationals to consider leaving Tokyo, in response to fears of spreading radioactive contamination.[90] The Fukushima accident has led to trace amounts of radiation, including iodine-131, caesium-134 and caesium-137, being observed around the world (New York State, Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon, California, Montreal, and Austria).[91][92][93] Small amounts of radioactive isotopes have also been released into the Pacific Ocean.

A monitoring system designed to detect nuclear explosions, operated by the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), tracked the dispersion of radioactivity from the crippled nuclear reactor on a global scale. Radioactive isotopes originating from Fukushima were picked up by over 40 CTBTO radionuclide monitoring stations. The CTBTO makes its monitoring data and analysis results available to all its 183 Member States. Around 1,200 scientific and academic institutions in 120 countries currently make use of this offer.[94]

On 12 March, radioactive releases first reached a CTBTO monitoring station in Takasaki, Japan, around 200 km away from the troubled power plant. The dispersion of the radioactive isotopes could then be followed to eastern Russia on 14 March and to the west coast of the United States two days later. By day 15, traces of radioactivity were detectable all across the northern hemisphere. Within one month, radioactive particles were also picked up by CTBTO stations in the southern hemisphere, located for example in Australia, Fiji, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea.[95][96]

According to one expert, the release of radioactivity is about one-tenth that from the Chernobyl disaster and the contaminated area is also about one-tenth that of Chernobyl.[97] A March 2012 report by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology agreed that radioactive debris from the damaged reactors had dispersed about one-eighth to one-tenth of the distance as those in the Chernobyl disaster.[98][99] According to a study conducted by Norwegian Institute for Air Research, the release of the particular isotope caesium-137 was about 40 percent of the total from Chernobyl.[100][101][102]

In March 2011, Japanese officials announced that "radioactive iodine-131 exceeding safety limits for infants had been detected at 18 water-purification plants in Tokyo and five other prefectures".[103] As of July 2011, the Japanese government has been unable to control the spread of radioactive material into the nation's food. Radioactive material has been detected in a range of produce produced in 2011, including spinach, tea leaves, milk, fish and beef, up to 200 miles from the nuclear plant. Crops produced in 2012 did not show signs of radioactivity contamination, cabbage, rice[104] and beef were tested before reaching market and showed insignificant levels of radiation. A Fukushima-produced rice market in Tokyo was accepted by consumers as safe.[104]

On 24 August 2011, the Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) of Japan published the results of the recalculation of the total amount of radioactive materials released into the air during the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. The total amounts released between 11 March and 5 April were revised downwards to 1.3 × 1017 Bq for iodine-131 and 1.1 × 1016 Bq for caesium-137, which is about 11% of Chernobyl emissions. Earlier estimations were 1.5 × 1017 Bq and 1.2 × 1016 Bq.[105][106]

On 8 September 2011 a group of Japanese scientists working for the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, the Kyoto University and other institutes, published the results of a recalculation of the total amount of radioactive material released into the ocean: between late March through April they found a total of 15,000 TBq for the combined amount of iodine-131 and caesium-137. This was more than triple the figure of 4,720 TBq estimated by the plant-owner. TEPCO made only a calculation about the releases from the plant in April and May into the sea. The new calculations were needed because a large portion of the airborne radioactive substances would enter the seawater when it came down as rain.[107]

In the first half of September 2011 the amount of radioactive substances released from the plant was about 200 million becquerels per hour, according to TEPCO, this was approximately one four-millionth of the level of the initial stages of the accident in March.[108] Traces of iodine-131 are still detected in several Japanese prefectures in the months of November[109] and December 2011.[110]

According to a report published in October 2011 by the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, between 21 March and mid-July around 2.7 × 1016 Bq of caesium-137 entered the ocean, about 82 percent having flowed into the sea before 8 April. This emission of radioactivity into the sea represents the most important individual emissions of artificial radioactivity into the sea ever observed. The Fukushima coast has one of the world's strongest currents and this transported the contaminated waters far into the Pacific Ocean, causing a high dispersion of the radioactive elements. The results of measurements of both the seawater and the coastal sediments lead to suppose that the consequences of the accident, for what concerns radioactivity, will be minor for marine life as of late 2011 (weak concentration of radioactivity in the water and limited accumulation in sediments). On the other hand, significant pollution of sea water along the coast near the nuclear plant might persist, because of the continuing arrival of radioactive material transported towards the sea by surface water running over contaminated soil. Further, some coastal areas might have less favorable dilution or sedimentation characteristics than those observed so far. Finally, the possible presence of other persistent radioactive substances, such as strontium-90 or plutonium, has not been sufficiently studied. Recent measurements show persistent contamination of some marine species (mostly fish) caught along the coast of Fukushima district. Organisms that filter water and fish at the top of the food chain are, over time, the most sensitive to caesium pollution. It is thus justified to maintain surveillance of marine life that is fished in the coastal waters off Fukushima.[111]

As of March 2012, there had been no reported cases of Fukushima residents suffering ailments related to radiation exposure. Experts cautioned that insufficient data was available so far to make conclusions on the impact on residents' health. Nevertheless, Michiaki Kai, professor of radiation protection at Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences, stated, "If the current radiation dose estimates are correct, (cancer-related deaths) likely won't increase."[112]

On 24 May 2012, TEPCO released their estimate of radiation releases due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster. An estimated 538,100 terabecquerels (TBq) of iodine-131, caesium-134 and caesium-137 was released. 520,000 TBq was released into the atmosphere between 12–31 March 2011 and 18,100 TBq into the ocean from 26 March – 30 September 2011. A total of 511,000 TBq of iodine-131 was released into both the atmosphere and the ocean, 13,500 TBq of caesium-134 and 13,600 TBq of caesium-137.[113]

In May 2012, TEPCO reported that at least 900 PBq had been released "into the atmosphere in March last year [2011] alone".[114][115] In August 2012, researchers found that 10,000 people living near the plant at the time of the accident had been exposed to well less than 1 millisievert of radiation, far less than Chernobyl residents.[116]

In October 2012 an article in Science-magazine concluded, that at that time radiation was still leaking from the reactor-site into the ocean. Fishing in the waters around the site was still prohibited, and the levels of radioactive 134Cs and 137Cs in the fish caught were not lower compared with the levels found after the disaster. [117] On 26 October 2012 TEPCO admitted that it could not exclude radiation emissions into the ocean, although the radiation levels were stabilised. Undetected leaks into the ocean from the reactors, could not be ruled out, because their basements remain flooded with cooling water, and the 2,400-foot-long steel and concrete wall between the site’s reactors and the ocean, that should reach 100 feet underground, was still under construction, and would not be finished before mid-2014. Around August 2012 two greenling were caught close to the Fukushima shore. They contained more than 25,000 becquerels of cesium-137 per kilogram of fish, the highest cesium levels found in fish since the disaster and 250 times the government’s safety limit.[118][119]

A report by the World Health Organization(WHO) published in February 2013 anticipated that there would be no noticeable increases in cancer rates for the overall population, but somewhat elevated rates for particular sub-groups. For example infants of Namie Town and Iitate Village were estimated to have a 6% relative increase in female breast cancer risk and a 7% relative increase in male leukemia risk. A third of emergency workers involved in the accident would have increased cancer risks.[120]

However the WHO expressly stated that the values stated in its report were expressed as relative increases, and not representative of the absolute increase in developing cancer:[121]

These percentages represent estimated relative increases over the baseline rates and are not absolute risks for developing such cancers. Due to the low baseline rates of thyroid cancer, even a large relative increase represents a small absolute increase in risks. For example, the baseline lifetime risk of thyroid cancer for females is just (0.75%)three-quarters of one percent and the additional lifetime risk estimated in this assessment for a female infant exposed in the most affected location is (0.5%)one-half of one percent.

In 2013, two years after the incident, the World Health Organization indicated that the residents of the area were exposed to so little radiation that it probably won't be detectable. They indicated that a Japanese baby's cancer lifetime risk would increase by about 1%.[122]

This page was last modified on 23 May 2013 at 02:31.

Fukushima Iitate 放射線＠飯舘村まとめ1～13（44） 20110423 35μSvh

アップロード日: 2011/05/03 See more: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list... Already uploaded movies connected to around 15 minutes

国会事故調　第4回委員会

国会　東京電力福島原子力発電所事故調査委員会 2012/07/29 に公開

参考人 : 斑目春樹氏原子力安全委員長寺坂信昭氏前原子力安全・保安院長

https://youtu.be/tOu3fFlfkns

（参考リンク　Reference link）:

国会事故調　The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC)

☆国会事故調 NAIIC 資料と映像 ☆

http://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/3856371/naiic.go.jp/en/resources/

The natinal Diet Japan of Fukushima Nuclear Accident Investgation Commssion　（English)

http://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/3856371/naiic.go.jp/resources/

東京電力原子力発電所事故に関わる両院議運合同協議会 20111208
https://youtu.be/c5sc_mq-xj8

NAIIC/Jikocho 4th Commission Mtg. 2012/3/14

公開日: 2012/07/19

NAIIC ： The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission

The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC) was established by the National Diet as the first independent investigation commission in the 66 years of Japan’s constitutional government.

The Chairman and all Commission members were selected from the private sector, and conducted the investigation completely independent of government. NAIIC was able to utilize all parliamental investigative rights, which allowed the Commission to be insulated from the influence of the government administration, political parties and Diet members, etc. Our activities were also held without interference from Diet deliberations or ongoing Diet sessions.

東京電力原子力発電所事故に関わる両院議運合同協議会　20111208

2012/07/24 に公開
国会東京電力福島原子力発電所事故調査委員会
https://youtu.be/c5sc_mq-xj8
2011/12/8
国会事故調査委員会発足のための両院議運合同協議会
衆議院TVはこちらから→http://www.shugiintv.go.jp/jp/index.p...
http://www.shugiintv.go.jp/jp/index.php?ex=VL&deli_id=41488&media_type=

雲隠れした「プルトニウムは飲んでも安心」の大橋弘忠

自分の頭が壊れてる「格納容器が壊れるのは1億年に1回」の大橋弘忠

アップロード日: 2011/05/18

平成17年12月25日

佐賀県主催プルサーマル公開討論会「玄海原子力発電所３号機プルサーマル計画の安全性について」

唐津ロイヤルホテル

全村避難～飯舘村、ある家族の150日～2 4

2013.3.21　飯舘村③

公開日: 2013/03/24